SNP-based genetic linkage map of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) using next-generation RAD sequencing
- Bingguang Xiao†1,
- Yuntao Tan†2,
- Ni Long2,
- Xuejun Chen1,
- Zhijun Tong1,
- Yang Dong2 and
- Yongping Li1Email author
© Xiao et al. 2015
Received: 25 February 2015
Accepted: 18 September 2015
Published: 6 October 2015
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) is an important model system, which has been widely used in plant physiological studies and it is particularly useful as a bioreactor. Despite its importance, only limited molecular marker resources are available for genome analysis, genetic mapping and breeding. Restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) is a powerful new method for targeted sequencing across the genomes of many individuals. This approach has broad potential for genetic analysis through linkage mapping.
We constructed a RAD library using genomic DNA from a BC1 backcross population. Sequencing of 196 individuals was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500. Two linkage maps were constructed, one with a reference genome and another, termed as de novo identification of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) by RAD-seq, without a reference genome. Overall, 4138 and 2162 SNP markers with a total length of 1944.74 and 2000.9 cM were mapped to 24 linkage groups in the genetic maps based on reference genome and without reference, respectively.
Using two different SNP discovery methods based on next generation RAD sequencing technology, we have respectively mapped 2162 and 4318 SNPs in our backcross population. This study gives an excellent example for high density linkage map construction, irrespective of genome sequence availability, and provides saturated information for downstream genetic investigations such as quantitative trait locus analyses or genomic selection (e.g. bioreactor suitable cultivars).
KeywordsTobacco Linkage map Nicotiana tabacum L. RAD sequencing SNP
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L., 2n = 4x = 48) is an important model system in plant biotechnology , due to its unique advantages over other plant species. It not only has relatively short generation time and high protein content, but also can be easily genetically transformed [2, 3]. For this reason, tobacco has been widely used in studies on plant response to pathogens , pyridine alkaloid (like nicotine) biosynthesis , cell cycle [6, 7], oxidative stress  and pollen tube development . More importantly, tobacco is an attractive green bioreactor proved to be able to produce a wide range of therapeutic proteins including antibodies [10–12], vaccines [13, 14] and immunomodulatory molecules such as cytokines [15, 16].
Despite the prospective applications of tobacco in pharmaceutical production, limited cultivars exist with low nicotine and alkaloid contents. Breeding new cultivars suitable for pharmaceutical production is further complicated by the paltry genomic information available to the public. Genetic linkage mapping based on molecular markers permits the elucidation of genome structure and organization . It provides critical information for quantitative trait locus (QTL) marker assisted selection. For some economic plants, including potato (Solanum tuberosum), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), eggplant (Solanum melongena), pepper (Capsicum species) and Petunia (Petunia hybrida), whole genome sequencing and genetic linkage maps have elucidated their genome structures and assisted breeding cultivars with molecular markers . Therefore, a high density genome-based linkage map of the tetraploid tobacco will improve current genetic research tools in search of new cultivars. Thus far, linkage maps for tobacco have been constructed by using low-throughput molecular markers like simple sequence repeats (SSRs), which resulted in low density linkage maps [19, 20].
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as the most abundant type of DNA variations are currently used as genetic markers for their wide distribution in the genome . Compared to genetic markers based on size discrimination or hybridization, SNPs directly interrogate sequence variation and possess the potential of reducing genotyping errors . SNP discovery is amenable to high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which produce DNA sequences at a rate several orders of magnitude faster than conventional sequencing methods .
According to unpublished data, the genome size of tobacco is approximately 4.5 Gb. Because of the huge genome, great challenges must be faced up to. Reduced representation library sequencing is an energetic approach, which has been used for many genome studies . Restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) technology [24–26] facilitates genetic variant discovery by allowing ortholog sequences to be targeted in multiple individuals . This method relies on sequencing of DNA regions flanking the restriction sites of specific restriction enzymes. In brief, DNA fragments from the digestion of a chosen restriction enzyme are ligated with an adapter, which contains a molecular identifying sequence (MID) unique to each sample. The DNA sequences flanking each restriction site are sequenced via the massively parallel Illumina sequencing technology . RAD sequencing is highly successful in re-identifying genomic regions controlling known phenotypes [29–31].
To generate a high density genome linkage map for tobacco, we have developed here 4138 SNP markers using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 high-throughput platform. The mapping population was generated by crossing two tobacco (N. tabacum L.) cultivars. The F1 progeny was back-crossed to the parents. A total of 193 progenies were generated and all individuals were used for linkage map construction. We conducted SNP detection both with and without a reference genome, the latter referred to as de novo identification of SNP by RAD-seq (DISR). We compared these two methods and constructed a genetic map of tobacco based on a backcross (BC1) population.
RAD library preparation and sequencing
Library information and data output
Raw reads (M)
Raw bases (Gb)
Clean reads (M)
Clean bases (Gb)
GC rate (%)
Q20 rate (%)
SNP calling and genotyping
Two distinct protocols were executed in SNP calling and genotyping: the first was with a reference genome; the second was without a reference genome, which we refer to as DISR. In the first protocol, 24.8 billion clean reads were aligned to the reference sequences (unpublished data) using SOAPaligner  (Release 2.21, http://soap.genomics.org.cn/). The mapping results were processed with Samtools . Variations were called using the Unified Genotyper (Version 3.1, Genome Analysis Tool Kit) . Any nucleotide difference between reads and the reference genome was initially called as variant. A large volume output of 7,343,419 raw SNPs suggested improvement in data assemblage. Three parameters (genotype coverage, genotype quality, and SNP quality) generated by the Unified Genotyper were used as criteria for filtering variant output.
Statistics for SNPs based on the two different methods
Method of SNPcalling
χ 2 < 15
Based on reference genome
In the second protocol (DISR), 181,770 raw SNPs were obtained after the clean reads were processed. Using the same MMD threshold as the first protocol, a total of 7457 SNPs (p < 0.01) were recovered. In total, 3282 markers were then selected (by the χ 2 test) for the construction of genetic map in JoinMap 4.0  (Table 2).
Statistics of 24 linkage groups with the reference genome
Marker density (cM/loci)
Statistics of 24 linkage groups without the reference genome (DISR)
Marker density (cM/loci)
Comparison of the DISR and the reference genome methods
Comparison of linkage maps for tobacco
Type of markers
No. of markers
Map length (cM)
Hicks Broadleaf × Red Russian
Flue-cured tobacco Taiyan 7 × burley tobacco cultivar Bailei 21
Burley37 × Burley21
Hicks Broadleaf × Red Russian
Hicks Broadleaf × HHDJY(HD)
Honghua Dajinyuan (HD) × HBL
(HD × RBST) × HD
(HD × RBST) × HD
The Mendelian basis of quantitative traits provides a genetic framework for the dissection of polygenic traits  and can pave the way for the identification of candidate loci controlling the inheritance of complex traits. NGS technology makes it possible to achieve dense SNP marker coverage of genomes without the need for a reference sequence [24, 26]. An example of this is restriction-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq), which was originally developed as a tool for genetic mapping in fish and fungi  and later expanded to many other species, including plants (Lolium perenne L., Momordica charantia, Corchorus olitorius L.) [25, 30, 40, 41]. In this study, a separate linkage map via the DISR method was also obtained, which did not need a reference genome. The DISR linkage map contains 2162 markers with a total coverage of 2700.9 cM and an average distance of 1.8 cM between markers. It demonstrates that these two high density linkage maps are compelling tools for gene (Table 5) and QTL mapping and marker-assisted breeding .
A comparison of the two maps showed an overlap of 677 markers (Fig. 4). We compared the ratios of overlaps between the two protocols and found that the use of a reference genome was more efficient than without a reference genome. In the method of DISR, the information of only one end of the pair reads is used for the SNP calling. However, if we conduct the SNP calling with a reference genome, whole genome information is used. This kind of experiment is often required in nature, particularly in building linkage maps for species that do not have a complete genome sequence database. However, an integration of the two protocols could result in a higher density map and thus, assist in the breeding of other low nicotine and alkaloid content cultivars.
Using next generation RAD sequencing technology for two distinct SNP discovery methods, we have respectively mapped 2162 and 4318 SNPs in tobacco. This study gives an excellent example for high density linkage map construction, irrespective of reference genome sequence availability, and provides saturated information for downstream genetic investigations such as QTL analyses or genomic selection (e.g. bioreactor suitable cultivars).
Two tobacco varieties, Hong hua Da jin yuan (HD) and Resistance to Black Shank Tobacco (RBST) were used to develop the BC1 inbred population. HD is a high leaf mass cultivar from southwest of China. RBST has high resistance to tobacco black shank disease. The BC1 inbred population was generated through a (HD × RBST) × HD crossing in a breeding unit in Yuxi of Yunnan Province.
RAD library preparation and sequencing
Fresh young leaves were collected from HD, RBST, F1 (HD × RBST) and 193 individuals of BC1 (F1 × HD) population. Leaf samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Genomic DNA isolation and purification were conducted using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen). DNA quality was analyzed in 1 % agarose gel. The concentration of extracted DNA was determined by a spectrophotometer. Approximately 15 μg of purified DNA was processed to obtain 10 RAD libraries, each including about 20 individuals following the protocol of Baird et al.  and the instructions of the reagent manufacturers. Genomic DNA from individual samples was digested with EcoRI (New England Biolabs). Individual specific barcodes were ligated with an adaptor by T4 DNA ligase for sample multiplexing. Ligated DNA samples were pooled and sheared, and consequently electrophoresed to isolate DNA fragments with sizes of 300–700 bp in 1.5 % agarose gel. Quick Blunting Kit (New England Biolabs) was used to generate phosphorylated blunt ends. Klenow Fragment (3′ → 5′ exo-; New England Biolabs) was used to add adenosine to the 3′ end. An adapter with divergent ends (P2 adapter) was ligated to enable selective PCR. The samples were PCR-amplified and the libraries purified with MinElute column (Qiagen) to obtain approximately 100 μl (>50 ng μl−1) of sequencing libraries. The obtained RAD libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 in 100 bp pair-end reads.
SNP calling with reference genome
The raw reads were removed using the following criteria: (a) reads with >10 % unidentified nucleotides (N), (b) reads with >40 bases having Phred quality ≤7, and (c) putative PCR duplicates generated by PCR amplification in the library construction process (i.e., read 1 and read 2 of two paired-end reads that were completely identical). All the obtained short clean reads were aligned to reference sequences (unpublished data) using SOAPaligner (Release 2.21, http://soap.genomics.org.cn/) . During alignment, long reads with high error rates at 3′-ends were substituted with 5′ 32 bp subsequence as seeds. The entire lengths of the reads were used. Five mismatches in one read were allowed (important arguments: -l 32 -v 5). The mapping results SAM files were converted with Samtools . Variations were called using the Unified Genotyper (Version 3.1, Genome Analysis Tool Kit) . Any nucleotide difference between reads and the reference genome was identified as a variant. This criterion generated a large variant output, which was filtered by three parameters generated with the Unified Genotyper, including genotype coverage, genotype quality, and SNP quality.
SNP calling without reference genome (DISR)
Within each individual, identical reads were aligned together into clusters (other study termed it as stacks) (Fig. 5b–d). The pairwise sequence divergence among clusters was used to group them into putative loci (Fig. 5e). Loci were defined as a set of clusters such that for each cluster there is another cluster in the locus that is at most one nucleotide divergent. Clusters containing excessive numbers of sequence reads can occur when multiple, repetitive sites in the genome are all within a single nucleotide of one another. For this analysis, all clusters with a depth of coverage greater than two standard deviations above the mean cluster depth were removed and the remaining clusters were merged into a locus. For each nucleotide site in a locus, a likelihood ratio test of the read counts of alternative nucleotides was used to test whether the allele frequency of the most observed nucleotide was significantly larger than a threshold p following the method of Emerson et al. . After these processes, an in-house perl script was used to integrate the clusters of parents and F1 progeny into a catalog and create a set of all possible loci in a mapping cross. Then, clusters of BC1 progenies are matched against the catalog to determine the genotype at each locus in every individual in the cross population.
Genotyping and linkage mapping
Distorted markers (p < 0.01) were filtered off to construct a genetic map by a Chi square test (χ 2 < 15 was selected for JoinMap 4.0) . LGs were identified with an independent logarithm of odds (LOD) threshold of 7. Due to the large number of markers segregating in the population, if the number of the linkage group is more than 220, we used (in JoinMap 4.0) a maximum likelihood algorithm mapping the marker order for calculation efficiency . We also calculated genetic distances (cM) using Haldane’s mapping function. However, the scope of corresponding linkage groups (3000–6000 cM) exceeded JoinMap 4.0 and therefore, the linkage length was divided by 100 for map presentation. In other linkage groups whose maker number was equal or less than 220, a linear regression algorithm and Kosambi’s mapping function was used for map construction and genetic distance estimation . Following the initial mapping, potential errors that appeared as doubtful double-recombinants were identified using genotype probabilities function of JoinMap 4.0  (p < 0.001). The suspicious genotype was replaced by a missing value as suggested by Isidore et al.  and Van Ooijen . A linkage map was then constructed afresh using the corrected dataset. Potential error elimination and linkage map construction was iterated until no dubious genotype was identified. Markers with >45 % missing values or distorted (χ 2 test, p < 0.001, d.f. = 2) were removed in each step of the iteration.
BX: constructed map population, extracted tobacco DNA, performed sequencing and wrote part of the text. YT: performed most of the bioinformatic analysis and wrote part of the text. NL: performed data preprocess. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by Grants from CNTC [110201201003 (JY-03), 110201301006 (JY-06)], and YNTC (2012YN01, 2013YN01).
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Olmstead RG, Bohs L, Migid HA, Santiago-Valentin E, Garcia VF, Collier SM. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon. 2008;57:1159–81.Google Scholar
- Komori T, Imayama T, Kato N, Ishida Y, Ueki J, Komari T. Current status of binary vectors and superbinary vectors. Plant Physiol. 2007;145:1155–60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2019–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romeis T. Protein kinases in the plant defence response. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001;4:407–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Häkkinen ST, Tilleman S, Swiatek A, De Sutter V, Rischer H, Vanhoutte I, et al. Functional characterisation of genes involved in pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis in tobacco. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:2773–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mironov V, Veylder LD, Montagu MV, Inzéa D. Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plants—the nexus. Plant Cell. 1999;11:509–22.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagami H, Sekine M, Murakami H, Shinmyo A. Tobacco retinoblastoma-related protein phosphorylated by a distinct cyclin-dependent kinase complex with Cdc2/cyclin D in vitro. Plant J. 1999;18:243–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langebartels C, Kerner K, Leonardi S, Schraudner M, Trost M, Heller W, et al. Biochemical plant responses to ozone: I. Differential induction of polyamine and ethylene biosynthesis in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1991;95:882–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor LP, Hepler PK. Pollen germination and tube growth. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997;48:461–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay R, Wang D, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. Tobacco, a highly efficient green bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:214–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villani ME, Morgun B, Brunetti P, Marusic C, Lombardi R, Pisoni I, et al. Plant pharming of a full-sized, tumour-targeting antibody using different expression strategies. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009;7:59–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sack M, Paetz A, Kunert R, Bomble M, Hesse F, Stiegler G, et al. Functional analysis of the broadly neutralizing human anti-HIV-1 antibody 2F5 produced in transgenic BY-2 suspension cultures. FASEB J. 2007;21:1655–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandsma M, Wang X, Diao H, Kohalmi SE, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. A proficient approach to the production of therapeutic glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in transgenic plants. Open Biotechnol J. 2009;3:9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burtin D, Chabre H, Olagnier D, Didierlaurent A, Couret MN, Comeau D, et al. Production of native and modified recombinant Der p 1 molecules in tobacco plants. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menassa R, Du C, Yin Z, Ma S, Poussier P, Brandle J, et al. Therapeutic effectiveness of orally administered transgenic low-alkaloid tobacco expressing human interleukin-10 in a mouse model of colitis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5:50–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang D, Brandsma M, Yin Z, Wang A, Jevnikar A, Ma S. A novel platform for biologically active recombinant human interleukin-13 production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6:11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Xia Y, Ren X, Chen Y, Huang L, Huang S, et al. Construction of a SNP-based genetic linkage map in cultivated peanut based on large scale marker development using next-generation double-digest restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq). BMC Genom. 2014;15:351.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Foolad MR, Panthee DR. Marker-assisted selection in tomato breeding. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2012;31:93–123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bindler G, Plieske J, Bakaher N, Gunduz I, Ivanov N, Van der Hoeven R, et al. A high density genetic map of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) obtained from large scale microsatellite marker development. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;123:219–30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bindler G, van der Hoeven R, Gunduz I, Plieske J, Ganal M, Rossi L, et al. A microsatellite marker based linkage map of tobacco. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;114:341–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brookes AJ. The essence of SNPs. Gene. 1999;234:177–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliver RE, Lazo GR, Lutz JD, Rubenfield MJ, Tinker NA, Anderson JM, et al. Model SNP development for complex genomes based on hexaploid oat using high-throughput 454 sequencing technology. BMC Genom. 2011;12:77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young AL, Abaan HO, Zerbino D, Mullikin JC, Birney E, Margulies EH. A new strategy for genome assembly using short sequence reads and reduced representation libraries. Genome Res. 2010;20:249–56.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barchi L, Lanteri S, Portis E, Acquadro A, Valè G, Toppino L, et al. Identification of SNP and SSR markers in eggplant using RAD tag sequencing. BMC Genom. 2011;12:304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hegarty M, Yadav R, Lee M, Armstead I, Sanderson R, Scollan N, et al. Genotyping by RAD sequencing enables mapping of fatty acid composition traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne(L.)). Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11:572–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonaventure G, Barchi L, Lanteri S, Portis E, Valè G, Volante A, et al. A RAD tag derived marker based eggplant linkage map and the location of QTLs determining anthocyanin pigmentation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43740.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baxter SW, Davey JW, Johnston JS, Shelton AM, Heckel DG, Jiggins CD, et al. Linkage mapping and comparative genomics using next-generation RAD sequencing of a non-model organism. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19315.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, Brown CG, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 2008;456:53–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfender WF, Saha MC, Johnson EA, Slabaugh MB. Mapping with RAD (restriction-site associated DNA) markers to rapidly identify QTL for stem rust resistance in Lolium perenne. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122:1467–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chutimanitsakun Y, Nipper RW, Cuesta-Marcos A, Cistué L, Filichkina T, Johnson EA, et al. Construction and application for QTL analysis of a restriction site associated DNA (RAD) linkage map in barley. BMC Genom. 2011;12:4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1966–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011;43:491–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW. JoinMap ® 4, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Wageningen: Kyazma BV; 2006.Google Scholar
- Fulton TM, Van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT, Tanksley SD. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1457–67.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Pétiard V, Tanksley SD. Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics. 2006;174:1407–20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poland J, Endelman J, Dawson J, Rutkoski J, Wu S, Manes Y, et al. Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-by-sequencing. Plant Gen. 2012;5:103–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansen RC. Complex plant traits: time for polygenic analysis. Trends Plant Sci. 1996;1:89–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsumura H, Miyagi N, Taniai N, Fukushima M, Tarora K, Shudo A, et al. Mapping of the gynoecy in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) using RAD-seq analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87138.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kundu A, Chakraborty A, Mandal NA, Das D, Karmakar PG, Singh NK, et al. A restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) linkage map, comparative genomics and identification of QTL for histological fibre content coincident with those for retted bast fibre yield and its major components in jute (Corchorus olitorius L., Malvaceae s. l.). Mol Breed. 2015;35:19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xu Y, Crouch JH. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci. 2008;48:391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM, Hohenlohe PA, Cresko WA, Bradshaw WE, et al. Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:16196–200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haldane J. The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distances between the loci of linked factors. J Genet. 1919;8:299–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kosambi DD. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen. 1943;12:172–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Isidore E, van Os H, Andrzejewski S, Bakker J, Barrena I, Bryan GJ, et al. Toward a marker-dense meiotic map of the potato genome: lessons from linkage group I. Genetics. 2003;165:2107–16.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong-Bo M, Jian-Min Q, Yan-Kun L, Jing-Xia L, Tao W, Tao L, et al. Construction of a molecular genetic linkage map of tobacco based on SRAP and ISSR markers. Acta Agron Sin. 2008;34:1958–63.Google Scholar
- Cai C-C, Chai L-G, Wang Y, Xu F-S, Zhang J-J, Lin G-P. Construction of genetic linkage map of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) and genetic dissection of partial traits. Acta Agron Sin. 2009;35:1646–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu X, Gui Y, Xiao B, Li Y, Tong Z, Liu Y, et al. Development of DArT markers for a linkage map of flue-cured tobacco. Chin Sci Bull. 2012;58:641–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tong Z-J, Jiao F-C, Wu X-F, Wang F-Q, Chen X-J, Li X-Y, et al. Mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying six agronomic traits in flue-cured tobacco. Acta Agron Sin. 2013;38:1407–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar